What We Believe
Apologia Daily stands within historic, creedal Christianity — the faith summarized in the Apostles' and Nicene Creeds and held in common, for nearly two thousand years, across the great branches of the Church.
We are deliberately a "mere Christianity" project, in C. S. Lewis's sense: we defend the faith that Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestants share, rather than any one tradition's distinctives. Our doctrinal commitments are the historic essentials.
With the whole Church, we confess the Apostles' Creed:
And, with the councils of the undivided Church, the Nicene Creed (Constantinople, AD 381):
* "catholic" here means universal — the whole Church across time and place, not a single denomination.
† The bracketed "[and the Son]" (the filioque) is confessed by the Western churches; the Eastern churches keep the original "who proceeds from the Father." This is a genuine, historic East–West difference, and—true to our neutrality—we do not adjudicate it.
Creed texts: the modern-English versions of the English Language Liturgical Consultation (ELLC), Praying Together (1988), used with acknowledgment.
In short, with the historic creeds we hold: one God, eternally Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; the full deity and full humanity of Jesus Christ; his bodily death, resurrection, and future return; the inspiration and authority of Scripture; humanity's need of rescue; and salvation as God's gift, received by grace. These are the convictions every argument on this site is meant to serve and stay within.
On the questions that have long and sincerely divided faithful Christians — the mode and meaning of baptism, church government, the Lord's Supper, predestination and free will, the details of the end times, the age of the earth, and more — Apologia Daily takes no party line. Where these come up, our aim is to present the historic options fairly so you can think them through, not to settle them for you. Reasonable, devout believers land in different places on these matters, and we respect that.
Every argument we publish is written to fit within this creedal orthodoxy and to avoid adjudicating intra-Christian disputes. It also shapes our tone: because we believe the truth can bear scrutiny, we are free to represent critics fairly and to admit the genuine difficulties — always, as 1 Peter 3:15 puts it, "with gentleness and respect."
Faithfulness to Jesus Christ and to this historic, creedal orthodoxy matters more to us than the platform's reach, growth, or success — every time. Where the two ever pull apart, orthodoxy wins. Every essay, answer, and reel on this site passes an independent doctrinal review against this statement before it is published.
We would genuinely rather hear it. If any page here reads to you as crossing a line of this creedal faith — or leaning, even slightly, toward a distortion of Christ — please tell us, and we will review it against this statement. Report a doctrinal concern →